"A Meeting, 1884” by Maria Bashkirtseff
|
- Pre-VTS
Looking back at the data from their Pre-VTS writings I really remembered how far my students have come this semester. Their Pre-VTS data showed them having a total word count of 40-100wds with an impressive 1-6 adjectives. They initially used very little to no conditional language and were about half and half with their assertions with evidence and without evidence. They used very little to no revision of thought or multiple interpretations. The initial comprehension strategy used predominantly was inference with a few visualizing.
- Post-VTS
- Analyze and Discuss
Yes, the narratives were more elaborate
-Greater word count?
yes, the word count was over doubled
-Increased use of adjectives?
again, yes, the use of adjectives was over doubled
-Assertions with evidence?
yes, almost all of the assertions had evidence in the Post-VTS where-as only about half did in the Pre-VTS
-Use of conditional language?
The students did a great job of this in the Post-VTS and averaged about 5 uses of conditional language each.
-Suggesting various possibilities?
In the Post-VTS the students did a great job of suggesting various possibilities and multiple interpretations. There was very little of this in the Pre-VTS.
- Interpret Preliminary Findings
- Discuss anything out-of-the-ordinary
- Note any Surprises
I expected everything to improve somewhat but I was surprised at how much it had improved especially the total word count. I was surprised that it was more than double from the Pre-VTS.
Very exciting results! YOur persistence and faith in the process seems to have paid off!
ReplyDelete